Blog
Stop by often to see what Kelly Monroe Kullberg and Lael Arrington, the editors of A Faith and Culture devotional, have to share about faith and our culture.

Download our Small Group Discussion Guide.

LATEST BLOG
Lost-Three ultimate endings: All is black. All is one. All is well.
May 24th, 2010
 
Jimmy Kimmel touted his three comedic alternate endings to Lost. The following may not be story arcs for a blockbuster cast reunion, but what about these slightly more realistic alternatives:

All is black Jack closes his eyes (or eye) and breathes his last. The chemical and electrical impulses in his brain fade and stop. Rigormortis sets in. His body decays there in the bamboo arbor. Dust to dust. It is the same end as the man in black. Same end as Ben. And Hurley, Kate, Sawyer and the rest. The choices they made in this life have no ultimate meaning beyond the experience of this life. The fellowship and community that means so much is lost forever. As is each individual. All is lost.

All is one Jack closes his eyes and breathes his last. Wakes up in the sideways reality. Oceanic flight 815 has landed safely. He reconciles with his son, heals Lock and, touching his Father’s coffin, recovers the memories of his life on the island. All the choices he made to lead and love and sacrifice flash before his eyes in scene after scene of heartache and joy. The richness of the person he became through loss and love flood back into his soul. He is so much the deeper for it. Transformed by suffering and good choices, his joy is so much greater than that of the smaller life he was living.

Ben is outside. His selfish choices have made him a poorer person. The broken trust in all his relationships separates him from the loving fellowship of the community. Forgiveness is offered, but what happened happened. How does a lifetime of choosing self over others finally dissolve into choosing a loving, sacrificial community? That’s just not the person Ben has become. He’s not ready to join the community yet. He is in limbo? Purgatory? How will he reconcile or work out the consequences of his choices made from both great wounds and self-centered choices? We don’t know.

After the grand reunion the door opens. Christian Shepherd, Jack’s Dad, steps into the light. Reminds me of the eastern leaning The Fountain with Hugh Jackman and Rachel Weiss. “Death is the beginning of awe.” But in that movie as well as all Eastern thought, death is also the end of individuality as each one finally transcends individual pain, selfishness, willfullness and desire to become one with the all.

What might happen in this sideways story line as each individual steps into the light? Perhaps, as in The Fountain, if the Source of all things is impersonal, then he or she ceases to exist as a person but is transported into an impersonal oneness with all others, with everything in the Universe. All the memories they have recovered of their individual lives are poured into the ocean of collective memory. Ultimately, all individuality is lost. There is no loving community of richly different individuals. Everything is connected and the unity eventually obliterates/subsumes the individuality. For to create is to choose. To choose is to have a will. How does creation or a collective will exist without the loss of individuality?

They step through the door and become one with the light and the water at the heart of the island. Golden and glowing and ??? bubbling? Existence ends in impersonal being. All is one.

All is well Jack closes his eyes and breathes his last. Wakes up in the loving community of friends, some who died before him, some after. As each one steps through the chapel door they step into the light that radiates, not from an impersonal wellspring, but from a Person. The greater which has created the lesser. (How can it be the other way around? How can an impersonal source of light and water create the richness of human love, life and complexity we’ve seen on the screen?

The recovered memories and the richness of their heroic acts and choices go with them. They remain the individuals we have come to know and love. Nothing of their individuality is lost. Not even their flaws. Their poor choices have been redeemed. They don’t have to work them off or be separated from the sacred circle. Forgiveness has been freely offered by the one who waits for them and loves them far more deeply than they love one another. Who became the evil and selfishness of their own lives and died in their place, but who was resurrected from the grave to offer them forgiveness and life. Even Ben. All is mercy and grace for those who choose to be reconciled with their Creator in the way he has provided. By his stripes, the scars from the whip lashes, all their wounds are healed. It is a beautiful mythology, a true myth, as CS Lewis has said. One that mirrors and yet transcends our own experience of how suffering and sacrifice and choosing others over self bring richness, life and joy. (In mho far more beautiful and meaningful than the mythology of impersonal electromagnetic light holding all things together and turning greedy, selfish people into smoke monsters.)

As Jack and Kate, Sun and Jen, Sawyer and Juliette step into the light of eternity, not simply one person awaits, rather a loving community of three persons, whose individuality and community are mirrored in these lives. The end of all things is co-participation—with each other and with the Father, Son and Spirit who protect and make good on promises and yet offer real choices with real consequences that ripple out into eternity. And if Ben remains on the outside, never ready to go in, that is Ben’s choice to be truly and deeply lost.

Those who enter find themselves in a new story. An unfolding plot far more exciting than mere existence. They continue to live individual lives of challenge and choices, service and leadership in a community of ever-deepening love. Life together becomes richer, deeper, higher and above all, more joyful. Nothing is lost but pain and separation. All is well.

 
Posted by @ 6:55
Uncategorized  |   No Comments»


PREVIOUS ENTRIES
F&C Contributor Bruce Herman sees paintings installed in Italian Monastary
Devo Commentary: Michael Card & Francis Schaeffer-Art, a Response to Beauty
F&C Devo contributor, artist Makoto Fujimura challenges Christians to create living art as a gift in times of material and emotional scarcity
PREVIOUS BLOG 1
August 4th, 2009

By Lael Arrington

Bruce's paintings 1

We received wonderful photos from Gordon College artist and professor Bruce Herman. These two triptychs, Miriam, Virgin Mother (Via Activa) and Second Adam (Via Contemplativa) have been permanently installed in a 13th century Benedictine monastery that Gordon College uses for its undergrad program and theology & art conference center. For greater detail of this beautiful work by Bruce please visit his the larger images on his website.

Bruce Herman 2

From a review of Miriam: Virgin Mother: “Bruce Herman investigates the life and experience of the Virgin Mary—one of the main subjects of traditional sacred art—but also one that has been scorned for the sentimental and often cloying depictions of the past three centuries. In his attempt to refresh this tradition, Herman has combined contemporary techniques, postmodern theory, and genuine faith in order to make images that are connected to the tradition, yet breaking new ground. Richly colored images and textured surfaces with nuanced symbolism in a contemporary voice, evoke the mysterious story of a virgin mother.”

Bruce Herman 3

 
Posted by larrington @ 05:07
 
April 2nd, 2009

Commentary on Art-week 1 by painter Bruce Herman from “The Body, Beauty and Brokenness.” Bruce is the Lothlórien professor of art at Gordon College and a contributor to A Faith and Culture Devotional on “Sex, Intimacy and Worship”. Enjoy the complete context of these remarks at his website.

[Brokenness figures prominently in Bruce’s art, especially his images of people. He challenges the viewer to consider what is a “beautiful” representation of human bodies and souls.]

This is my central thesis — that images of brokenness are actually more honest, truer, and therefore more beautiful in a fully developed sense of the word. The goodness of true images makes them beautiful. But what of our traditional sense of beauty? If, as Elaine Scarry writes in On Beauty and Being Just , the opposite of beauty is not ugliness but injury — how then are images of the body that show injury to be taken as beautiful?

Yet I would argue that the central image of the Western tradition is the broken body of Christ on the cross—and that very brokenness is the source of beauty, goodness, and truth in our lives…within the pain of crucifixion there is hope to be discovered through images of the broken body.

This is how I too want to be known—as a broken man whose work reveals hope and grace—grace from a loving God who himself has been broken. My belief is that Christians would not feel marginalized in the art world if we were to adopt this stance—of the exile, of the broken, rather that of the triumphalist.

The paradigmatic moment in which this truth is displayed is Christ before Pontius Pilate—the petty bureaucrat who said to Jesus, “Man, don’t you know that I have the power to set you free or to put you to death?” Jesus’ reply is the perfect response to power: “You have no power except that which is granted you by [the one who loves me most] My Father in Heaven.”

Thus, when God says, “My power is made perfect in weakness” (2Cor.12:9) he is not voicing some pious platitude, rather he is describing the lineaments of true power: love and sacrifice. I therefore find myself, a painter late in Western history, heir to a tradition deeply compromised by worldly notions of meaning that attach to prosaic, shallow standards of female beauty and masculine power. I am painting within a tradition that currently favors at best a fairly anemic understanding of the human form, a confused notion of beauty, and a deeply suspicious stance in relation to truth.

If Christ has planted me here in this broken and injured world of art, perhaps his power to redeem will only be found here, where things don’t fit, don’t make sense, and are not immediately understood as beautiful. Only as God’s light breaks through this brokenness will the story come clear and the outlines of the City of God be seen in the midst of the ruined human city.

 
Posted by larrington @ 07:21
 
March 7th, 2009

From Kelly:

Painter and author Makoto Fujimura (mentioned in Chuck Colson’s Faith & Culture Devotional entry on 911 in Week 15) recently spoke at the IAM (International Arts Movement) in New York City. To me the talk felt prophetically important.

In the midst of fear. In the midst of material and emotional scarcity. In the midst of the world’s collapsing idols, Mako encouraged the Church to draw on the Giver / Artist, and to let His creative Spirit spill over into a hurting world. Creating living art, out of love, in the form of kindnesses (whether friendship, food, hospitality, music, dance, painting, flower-arranging, whatever our gifts…).

Spiritual, emotional and material generosity is surprising in an age of perceived scarcity; therefore, we, the Church, can rise to the occasion. We create art not as commodity, but as a gift. Just as the Gospel is not commodity, but Gift.

Here’s the link in the hopes that it will soon to available. (The recording improves toward the 2nd half which you’ll not want to miss). http://internationalartsmovement.org/encounter2009

In such a times as this, the Church has a great opportunity to shine. To remain hopeful, cheerful and creative.

Every blessing as your faith paints, with light and warmth, our hurting culture,

Kelly Monroe Kullberg

 
Posted by larrington @ 21:01